Crookston officials stare down 'big old mess' in St. Paul

By Mike Christopherson, Managing Editor
Posted May 12, 2010 @ 12:12 PM
Print Comment

Typically around this time of year, City Administrator Aaron Parrish and City Clerk/Treasurer Betty Arvidson sit down with members of the city council to gather input on their biggest budget priorities, or hear about areas of the budget that some council members feel should be trimmed. Then, Parrish and Arvidson will take the information they've gleaned from the council and use it as they start crafting the next year's budget with the department heads.
   

 

As part of the process of crafting the city's 2011 budget, Monday evening's Finance Committee was supposed to be when council members offered up their input to Parrish and Arvidson.
   

 

But they didn't have much to offer. Considering the current and projected multi-billion deficits that have legislators and the governor scrambling in St. Paul to keep the state's finances from collapsing entirely, local officials seem resigned to the fact that doing much beyond hoping for the best but preparing for the worst is a futile gesture at best at this juncture.
   

 

"Quite frankly, it's a big old mess," Parrish said, summing up the saga in St. Paul.
   

 

It's not like the council is sitting on its hands, though. Earlier this year, from a list of proposed budget reductions totaling $458,000, the council authorized around $290,000 in reductions, some that take effect immediately and some that will over time. That reduction was supposed to give the city budget around $120,000 in breathing room when the latest reduction in Local Government Aid to Crookston was factored in.
   

 

Monday, however, council members were talking about the very real possibility of revisiting the list of proposed reductions, and cutting deeper.
   

 

"No one wanted to cut two police officers and save $115,000, but with talk like we're hearing tonight, that's probably moving up the ladder," said committee chair Marlys Mjoen, from ward two.
   

 

Capital expenditures have been minimal at best as a moratorium has been in place for more than a year. But Ward Four Council Member Wayne Melbye said holding the line on capital improvements will only help the bottom line so much. "Sooner or later it's going to be positions," he said.
   

 

Current budget law indicates that Crookston is in line for a $90,000 LGA reduction in 2011, but local officials are taking that with a grain of salt, at best. With a state budget deficit projected to be as high as $8 billion in the next biennium, Parrish said the city could be facing at least two biennial budget cycles before anything starts to look up.
   

Typically around this time of year, City Administrator Aaron Parrish and City Clerk/Treasurer Betty Arvidson sit down with members of the city council to gather input on their biggest budget priorities, or hear about areas of the budget that some council members feel should be trimmed. Then, Parrish and Arvidson will take the information they've gleaned from the council and use it as they start crafting the next year's budget with the department heads.
   

 

As part of the process of crafting the city's 2011 budget, Monday evening's Finance Committee was supposed to be when council members offered up their input to Parrish and Arvidson.
   

 

But they didn't have much to offer. Considering the current and projected multi-billion deficits that have legislators and the governor scrambling in St. Paul to keep the state's finances from collapsing entirely, local officials seem resigned to the fact that doing much beyond hoping for the best but preparing for the worst is a futile gesture at best at this juncture.
   

 

"Quite frankly, it's a big old mess," Parrish said, summing up the saga in St. Paul.
   

 

It's not like the council is sitting on its hands, though. Earlier this year, from a list of proposed budget reductions totaling $458,000, the council authorized around $290,000 in reductions, some that take effect immediately and some that will over time. That reduction was supposed to give the city budget around $120,000 in breathing room when the latest reduction in Local Government Aid to Crookston was factored in.
   

 

Monday, however, council members were talking about the very real possibility of revisiting the list of proposed reductions, and cutting deeper.
   

 

"No one wanted to cut two police officers and save $115,000, but with talk like we're hearing tonight, that's probably moving up the ladder," said committee chair Marlys Mjoen, from ward two.
   

 

Capital expenditures have been minimal at best as a moratorium has been in place for more than a year. But Ward Four Council Member Wayne Melbye said holding the line on capital improvements will only help the bottom line so much. "Sooner or later it's going to be positions," he said.
   

 

Current budget law indicates that Crookston is in line for a $90,000 LGA reduction in 2011, but local officials are taking that with a grain of salt, at best. With a state budget deficit projected to be as high as $8 billion in the next biennium, Parrish said the city could be facing at least two biennial budget cycles before anything starts to look up.
   

 

"The real bad year could be 2012; the best we can do is try to have our options in place and execute them when the circumstances dictate," he said. "It's up to the council to decide how comfortable you are with trying to get ahead of the curve. ...If you wait until something happens, it's too late."
  

 

"Everything" is on the table, including an increase in local property taxes, Parrish said. But Crookston, one of the poorest cities in Minnesota in terms of property tax wealth, generates only around $15,000 in additional property tax revenue for everyone 1 percent increase in the local levy.
   

 

"Raising taxes isn't even going to get close to covering the losses we're seeing and will continue to see in LGA," Mayor Dave Genereux said. "We're going to have to tighten our belt, and it's going to hurt."
   

 

"We likely will need some level of property tax increase, but we'll likely do something very manageable," Parrish explained. "At this point, with the pressures on our budget and inflation, it's something we have to seriously evaluate."
   

 

Over the past five years, the city's local tax levy has gone down 6 percent. When that’s combined with the increase in the city’s property tax base, over the same time period the city’s property tax rate has gone down 31 percent.
   

 

The legislative session is scheduled to adjourn May 17. Parrish on Monday described Gov. Pawlenty and the DFL-led legislature agreeing to a budget bill by the adjournment deadline as "fantasy land."
   

 

"So, at this point, we don't have a clue, basically," Mjoen said.
   

 

"No, we don't," Parrish responded. “It’s a bad deal.”
   
   
 

Loading commenting interface...